With new regulations recently submitted to the White House, guidance for the U.S. federal 45Z Clean Fuel Production Tax Credit (45Z) appears imminent. Pending final regulations, upstream CI reduction tactics like RECs and low CI ag feedstocks are likely to be critical for Biofuel plants seeking to lower their CI score and generate more 45Z credits.
One CI-reduction mechanism that’s been seeing strong activity is the purchase of Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) – referred to as Energy Attribute Credits (EACs) in GREET. Each REC represents one megawatt-hour (MWh) of renewable electricity delivered to the grid.
By purchasing and retiring RECs, plants can effectively offset their grid electricity consumption and lower their CI score under 45Z. For example, a medium-sized ethanol plant consuming 60 million kWh annually can reduce its CI by almost 6 points by fully offsetting their grid electricity via qualifying RECs*.
This framework originates from proposed regulations under the 45V Clean Hydrogen Tax Credit, which established criteria for using EACs to claim emissions reductions. The 45ZCF-GREET model and instructions currently allow EAC usage when calculating CI, setting a clear precedent for REC-based reductions.
To qualify under current guidance, RECs must meet three core criteria:
RECS represent a practical, third-party-enabled way to quickly reduce CI and generate more value under 45Z.
But RECs alone can only do so much.
RECs decarbonize the electricity that runs a plant; on-field practices decarbonize the grain that is supplied to the plant. Together they deliver the two largest controllable levers in lowering CI under 45Z in a fast, verifiable way with minimal capex.
Through verified, on-field practice changes, ethanol plants can source lower-carbon feedstocks from growers who implement practices such as:
When properly measured and verified, these practices enable CI reductions at a rate of up to 3x greater than what RECs can achieve alone.
Plants looking to take advantage of the on-field practices opportunity and familiar with RECs will find strong parallels between the two CI-reduction pathways:
1. Both replace high-emission inputs with certified low-carbon attributes
2. Both require strong MRV (measurement, reporting, verification) and documentation to qualify
3. Both are scalable but dependent on local conditions
Any MRV provider working in the 45Z space should bring:
Reach out to Chris Malone, VP of Biofuels - cmalone@indigoag.com at Indigo Ag, for more information.
*Note: it is possible this policy may change in the upcoming proposed rulemaking for 45Z.